Today's hottest deals

Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM-GS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 01 '17 at 17:36
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 113
54% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 188
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 22.8
20% 22.4 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 26
Splatting 19.3
19% 24.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
738GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 176
Mixed 174
131% 174 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.33
100% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB
375GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 23.9
Mixed 14.1
26% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.19
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 8GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM-GS3 FX Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback