Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-52  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Suntory_KL
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171128
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 21:06
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 61%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43% Average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 85.7
40% 63 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 236
23% 189 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 118C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 747
Write 551
Mixed 549
137% 616 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 34.6
112% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 150
144% 226 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Verbatim ClickUSB 64GB
41GB free, PID 025e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.6 1 1 1.1 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.8
Mixed 1
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.92 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra Luxe 32GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 37 22 7 6.9 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 125
Write 29.2
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 19.4
58% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-52 Builds (Compare 250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback