Today's hottest deals

HP StoreEasy 1440 Storage

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP StoreEasy 1440 Storage  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140210
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 30 '17 at 08:00
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2403 v2
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 48
2-Core 98.2
48% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 179
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 9TB
5TB free
Firmware: 5.42
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
Read 179
Write 547
Mixed 28.8
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 0.02
30% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 30.9
DQ Mixed 1.26
8% 19.4 MB/s
Inateck ASM1153E 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 23.8
Mixed 23.1
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.21
82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 108%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 107GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.42
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91% Outstanding
Read 227
Write 89.7
Mixed 120
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 4.33
4K Mixed 0.12
94% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 91%
Great: 91%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
Read 32.4
Write 27
Mixed 26.3
36% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 4.53
4K Mixed 0.64
180% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 713754-071 2x4GB
2 of 12 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback