Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 08:37
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 996
96% 789 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1972) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 59.5
46% 61 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 53.2
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,949
Write 1,370
Mixed 1,001
318% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 78
263% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,493
DQ Write 1,216
DQ Mixed 1,107
896% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G M.2 2280 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: ABDA4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 287 339 341 341 342 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 121%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
384GB free
Firmware: LDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 78 86 86 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 44.5
Write 48.5
Mixed 42
SusWrite 80.3
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.3
134% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 250GB
207GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 5.5 4.7 5.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.89% Terrible
Read 47.9
Write 8.5
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 7.4
21% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.89%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 29.1
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 29.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 27,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback