Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 754
80% 640 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 87B8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 212
Parallax 206
198% 221 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 159
Splatting 138
133% 166 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 161%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 439 436 425 425 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 356
Mixed 296
SusWrite 418
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 38.8
143% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 128
156% 274 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 103%
Great: 127%
KINGSTON 90GB
6GB free
Firmware: 501A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 63 69 65 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
Read 153
Write 90.9
Mixed 112
SusWrite 67.3
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 23.2
107% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 102
79% 110 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 47%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
8GB free
Firmware: 1B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,670
Write 1454
Mixed 634
277% 1,252 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 51.8
256% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 954
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 863
708% 999 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61
201GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 94 93 92 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 94.5
Mixed 71
SusWrite 92.7
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
33GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 105 105 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 108
Write 97
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 106
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 20.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $962
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback