Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 03:29
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1,077
102% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,476
91% 1,476 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 4.7
3% 4.7 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1525 824 829 832 833 833 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,761
Mixed 1353
SusWrite 946
318% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 83.8
296% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,382
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 1,247
932% 1,244 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 268%
Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
580GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 136 136 135 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 101
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 134
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 113%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
319GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 99.1
Write 97.2
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 61.5
103% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 40%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
352GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 60 62 61 63 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 59.8
104% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36%
Great: 50%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
64GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.3 6.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 121
Write 138
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 2.7
115% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
107% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 74%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
103GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 97 107 105 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 133
Write 167
Mixed 130
SusWrite 105
184% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
198% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 74%
WDC WD12 0EDAZ-11F3RA0 12TB
11TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 132 131 132 131 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.7% Excellent
Read 179
Write 186
Mixed 130
SusWrite 131
209% 157 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 0.9
376% 6.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 6.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
268% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%
ST10000D M0004-1ZC101 10TB
584GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 129 129 129 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 157
Write 162
Mixed 110
SusWrite 128
187% 139 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 89%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
9GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 97 107 103 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 126
Write 127
Mixed 100
SusWrite 104
154% 114 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 74%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
547GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 113 112 99 99 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 108
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 107
116% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.7
279% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 33.8
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 34.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback