Today's hottest deals

Asus B85-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 12:45
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 206
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 601
58% 477 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1492 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 119
Parallax 107
84% 110 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 88
74% 91.4 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,856
Write 5,072
Mixed 5,304
1,207% 5,411 MB/s
4K Read 512
4K Write 298
4K Mixed 188
1,175% 333 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 766
594% 822 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
41GB free
Firmware: VQDC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 191 181 193 196 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.4% Good
Read 227
Write 202
Mixed 167
SusWrite 190
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 32.1
116% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 127
110% 163 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 82%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
938GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 106
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
134GB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 149 150 149 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 102
SusWrite 149
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 109%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
661GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 135 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 140
Write 145
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 136
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 85%
WD WD3200AAJS-60Z0A0 1TB
619GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 32 18 20 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 3,691
Write 9.8
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 23.6
671% 938 MB/s
4K Read 652
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
27,347% 218 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 103%
WDC WD10 PURX-64E5EY0 1TB
281GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 18.3
Write 16
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 17.3
23% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 21%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
333GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 90
Write 91
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 79
111% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 99U5471-066.A00LF 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 1,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B85-PRO GAMER - $504

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback