Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka) 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 35.7 1-Core 41.6 2-Core 87.9 31% 55.1 Pts	4-Core 77 8-Core 82 11% 79.5 Pts	64-Core 84.5 5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 16.4 Reflection 26.4 Parallax 21.6 13% 21.5 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 16.1 Splatting 20 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate BUP SL 5TB 1,348 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 112 101 98 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 111 Write 105 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 102 22% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.5 3% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 13%
ADATA HD650 1TB 1,807 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 883GB free (System drive), PID a35a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 15 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 25.6 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 17.4 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.2 59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Adata M378B5173QH0-CK0 Adata 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19% Very poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.9 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16