Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M275

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M275  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M275
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '17 at 14:53
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6600-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 50.6
35% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 51.7
8-Core 52.7
7% 52.2 Pts
64-Core 54.4
3% 54.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-XT
Dell(1028 0D02) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 0.62
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.14
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$23
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 15.8
62% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
282GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 23.9
Mixed 9.99
24% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.25
44% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CF8 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M275 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback