Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	22.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170605
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '17 at 14:02
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 209 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 683 63% 528 Pts	64-Core 941 58% 941 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Palit(1569 1380) 2GB CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 19.6 Parallax 23.2 20% 22.5 fps	MRender 28.7 Gravity 25.6 Splatting 19.1 19% 24.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2996 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1135 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 78 (AE) Unknown 100 100 104 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 52 206158692383 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 8880951957 (F7) Unknown 100 100 287492512 (F8) Unknown 100 100 89475976	85.7% Excellent	Read 517 Write 328 Mixed 401 92% 415 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 31.9 123% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 54.1 70% 127 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 136 136 34387460518 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 203 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 838 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 178 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 215 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 215 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 210454511643 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	96.2% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 161 Mixed 160 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.2 102% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 107%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 949GB free Firmware: 04.05G09 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 142 140 9866 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 220 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 69 852 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 194 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 59 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 160 (C2) HDA temperature 123 103 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.9% Above average	Read 103 Write 84.4 Mixed 76.2 66% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.44 121% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 15GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 26290480 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1209 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2609846 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4604 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1185 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 73 58 454492187 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 113 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6084 (C2) HDA temperature 27 42 38654705691 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -100321846095769 (F1) Unknown 100 253 11592560960 (F2) Unknown 100 253 7954103048	87% Excellent	Read 160 Write 143 Mixed 132 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.17 76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2800 Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ TEAMGROUP-UD4-2800 Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 28.8 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 24.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $636

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)