Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 245
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 786
73% 607 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 108
Parallax 103
86% 105 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 103
Splatting 101
82% 99.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1829
Write 1,130
Mixed 556
257% 1,172 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 51.4
189% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 681
536% 759 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
SanDisk Ext SSD 1TB
301GB free, PID 5589
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 15 24 25 19 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 41
Write 41
Mixed 19
SusWrite 22.1
40% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.5
223% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 103%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
904GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 89 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 72.1
Write 55.4
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 88.1
90% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
157% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
648GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 65 65 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 68.8
Write 61.6
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 65.4
85% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,056
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback