Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 58.9 2-Core 118 53% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 232 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 235 14% 235 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Lighting 31.1 Reflection 33 Parallax 39.4 25% 34.5 fps	MRender 41.8 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 33 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 404 Write 360 Mixed 12.4 57% 259 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.3 45% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 125GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 38GB free, PID 140b Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 12 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 112 Write 46.5 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 17 47% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 40% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.5% Below average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 13.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.6 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	8x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $640