Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 123% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	44.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '17 at 13:06
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$116 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 277 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 851 86% 697 Pts	64-Core 1,094 68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 190 Parallax 169 142% 178 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 170 Splatting 127 114% 141 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GB 1,849 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0L00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2775 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 976 (64) Unknown 100 100 1164452 (AA) Unknown 100 100 75 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 16 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 30 (B2) Unknown 100 100 20 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1925 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 32 0 38657064992 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 5528 (E7) Temperature 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3806 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3026 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3818 (FA) Read error retry rate 253 253 0	50.8% Above average	Read 505 Write 178 Mixed 262 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 10.4 61% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.7 DQ Write 70.7 DQ Mixed 9.94 17% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 72%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 147 11283 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2821 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 10066 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1174 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 28 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2792 (C2) HDA temperature 116 104 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	92.7% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 160 Mixed 165 123% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.33 131% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 489GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 173 2158 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1883 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13759 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1674 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1832 (C2) HDA temperature 108 102 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	94.8% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 151 Mixed 150 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.52 4K Mixed 0.31 109% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 6x8GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 6 of 8 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 42.1 MC Mixed 41.3 120% 41.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 21.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $250Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	40x
Core i7-6850KIntel $105Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	31x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	33x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $170Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $300Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $749

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350