Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision 7920 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision 7920 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RN4PJ
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime14.5 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 09:25
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6128
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 759
75% 611 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan V
Nvidia(10DE 1218) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1912 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 191
Parallax 265
179% 225 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 237
Splatting 120
149% 190 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 155%
Great: 155%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG50PNV1T02 NVM 1TB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 543 753 854 877 899 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,784
Write 290
Mixed 404
SusWrite 700
173% 794 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 54.1
211% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 399
324% 474 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 201%
Great: 248%
Nvme KXG50PNV1T02 NVM 1TB
568GB free
Firmware: 4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1731 896 898 895 900 901 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,951
Write 1,804
Mixed 1,547
SusWrite 1,037
356% 1,584 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 78.4
272% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 876
675% 921 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 268%
Great: 248%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$109
292GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 138 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 121
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 140
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$109
529GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 120 121 123 122 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 115
Write 93.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 120
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$109
195GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 128 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 127
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$109
321GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 135 137 138 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 103
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 137
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$109
300GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 99 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 151
Write 128
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 97.9
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6D1 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 58.7
MC Mixed 33.2
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7920 Tower Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Dell Precision 7920 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback