Today's hottest deals

Notebook W65_67SR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook W65_67SR  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SR
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 99
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 432
48% 375 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0650) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 5.9
3% 6 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 112 122 127 125 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 362
Write 208
Mixed 241
SusWrite 120
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 43.5
159% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 165
138% 201 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 81%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
890GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 125 125 128 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 119
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 126
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SR Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback