Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A785-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4A785-M  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 15:47
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 44.7
39% 53.2 Pts
4-Core 71
8-Core 73.6
10% 72.3 Pts
64-Core 50.2
3% 50.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G100
Sapphire(174B 9840) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 1
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.6
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 71 74 55 24 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 78.2
Write 74.2
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 51
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.84% Terrible
MC Read 0.7
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2.9
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A785-M Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback