Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.61% Terrible	Memory 13.9 1-Core 29 2-Core 30.9 15% 24.6 Pts	4-Core 28.9 8-Core 43.6 4% 36.2 Pts	64-Core 55 3% 55 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 9.61% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420M 1,922 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0499) 1GB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 0.8 3% 3.23 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 0.1 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.4 6.9 5.8 6.7 5.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 734 Write 3.5 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 5.9 135% 189 MB/s	4K Read 140 4K Write 0.1 8,734% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.6 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 369 11% 369 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	40x
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	34x
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	24x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	3x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	19x
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 2,059 samples	13x
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GBUnknownBench 19%, 16 samples	3x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $275