Biostar A10N-8800E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A10N-8800E  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '21 at 01:57
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 82.8
37% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 167
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 17.7
14% 18.7 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 15.9
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
572GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 87 102 109 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 111
Write 25.7
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 98.8
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 84%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
7GB free, PID 007a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 4.1 4.4 4.6 4.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.4
8% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 8%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB
149GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 28
Write 25.5
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 25
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 3 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A10N-8800E Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-8800E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback