ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard imedia S1300

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Packard imedia S1300 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard imedia S1300
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100128
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '17 at 00:56
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80 4,468 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 94 45% 70.6 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 141 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA 4182) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 0.41 1% 1.02 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.17 1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z320 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 226 Write 48.6 Mixed 105 27% 126 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 3.86 40% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 79.7 DQ Mixed 5.1 18% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 78%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 385GB free, PID a207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 19.3 Write 19.1 Mixed 12.3 21% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 2x4GB 1,091 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.7% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 9.5 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical imedia S1300 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1300

CPU
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	8x
Athlon II X2 215AMD $29Bench 38%, 4,513 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 620AMDBench 44%, 5,981 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	3x
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	2x

SSD
860 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 68%, 207 samples	3x
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 4GBUnknownBench 25%, 202 samples	3x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	2x
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnifosaBench 35%, 775 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback