Panasonic CF-T8EWD30AE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPanasonic CF-T8EWD30AE  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFT8W-1
Memory2.3 GB free of 3.00391 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 19:45
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U9300
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 14.8
2-Core 34.1
29% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 34.3
8-Core 33.6
5% 33.9 Pts
64-Core 33.8
2% 33.8 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1252GSX 120GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV010G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 39 46 44 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 45.8
Write 46.6
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 44.5
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26%
Great: 31%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB
7GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 17 18 16 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 12.4
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 17.6
19% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 39GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback