Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 03:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$245
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 261
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 913
83% 697 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 652 502 411 406 408 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 709
Write 669
Mixed 640
SusWrite 463
139% 620 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 59.5
180% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 1,137
753% 895 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 148%
Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
181GB free
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 186 187 188 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 160
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 185
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2GLH72V1B 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.8% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback