Asrock Q1900M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Q1900M  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160401
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 14:50
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 45.7
26% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 76.6
8-Core 75.3
10% 75.9 Pts
64-Core 65
4% 65 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 3.6
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5" SATA3-128GB SSD 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0317A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 27 148 2.1 2.6 4.4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 216
Write 215
Mixed 200
SusWrite 54.4
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 5.9
26% 9.17 MB/s
DQ Read 77
DQ Write 87.6
DQ Mixed 39.1
41% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 84%
SSD N18A 256GB
184GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 130 135 142 159 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 318
Write 203
Mixed 236
SusWrite 145
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 17.9
64% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 38.6
68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
925GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 127 139 144 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 172
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 147
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 109%
USB2.0 CARD-READER 16GB
7GB free, PID 4678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.48 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.4
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback