ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E746

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E746 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB293
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160905
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '17 at 09:59
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6300U 59,619 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 178 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 255 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Fujitsu(10CF 18D1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4481 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	5.76% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 9.15 Parallax 4.91 5% 6.85 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 4.97 Splatting 12.1 7% 7.56 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.76% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-00000 256GB 796 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 99 99 1 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1816 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 54 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 16777215 (F1) Unknown 99 99 62 (F2) Unknown 99 99 46 (F9) Unknown 99 99 62	85% Excellent	Read 499 Write 463 Mixed 481 107% 481 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 20.6 117% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 80.9 DQ Mixed 22.5 27% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 110%
18 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 7GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 122 Write 28.7 Mixed 36.6 62% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.97 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.02 27% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB 32,056 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	40.2% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 10.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.4 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical LIFEBOOK E746 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E746

CPU
Core i5-6300UIntelBench 40%, 59,619 samples	32x
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	15x
Core i7-6600UIntelBench 45%, 31,982 samples	4x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	54x

SSD
SD8SB8U-256G-1016 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 77 samples	7x
MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 1,578 samples	5x
THNSNK256GCS8 256GBToshibaBench 64%, 63 samples	5x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	11x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	6x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 38%, 15,437 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback