Acer Aspire E1-571G

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire E1-571G (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EA50_HC_CR
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131216
Uptime	9.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '21 at 23:54
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 87.1 1-Core 80 2-Core 127 62% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 195 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 064B) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.67 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 41 64 28 14 68 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33% Below average	Read 174 Write 94.7 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 78.1 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 22.3 59% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 31.2 29% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 102%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 10 9.9 9.9 9.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 27 Write 24 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 9.9 16% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.5 181% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 92%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 52GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.6 7.3 7.4 6.6 7.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	9.79% Terrible	Read 36 Write 10.5 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 7 20% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 81% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.79% Great: 41%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 182GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 33 Write 25.8 Mixed 25 SusWrite 10.1 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 135GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	9.98% Terrible	Read 29.7 Write 21.8 Mixed 23 SusWrite 0.1 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.98% Great: 49%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 37GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 30 Write 22 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 0.1 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 58%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 501GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.4 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 26 Write 13 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 8.5 20% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 465GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.2% Terrible	Read 29.2 Write 16.5 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 1.1 20% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.2% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GB 2,133 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.1 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire E1-571G Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571G

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	162x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	58x
Core i7-3632QMIntelBench 61%, 24,912 samples	50x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	340x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	51x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	48x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,609 samples	56x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 44%, 3,343 samples	20x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16