Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P15FV2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P15FV2  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 20:08
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 148
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 244
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 5.9
3% 8.63 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.4
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-128M6M mSATA 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DM7110F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 263 291 294 308 308 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 466
Write 307
Mixed 254
SusWrite 292
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 35.4
129% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 176
157% 238 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
667GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 97 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 86.9
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 92.8
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P15FV2 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P15FV2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback