Asrock H67M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 08:09
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$48
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 136
60% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 217
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 34.1
28% 34.7 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 24.4
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 46.6
Write 55.5
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 33.3
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 43%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
331GB free
Firmware: D005SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 86.2
Write 82.4
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 83.1
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%
HITACHI HTS727550A9E364 500GB
466GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7 7 7 7 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Read 36.2
Write 6.7
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 7
16% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.B1GE3.9K10C Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-AE-F 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback