Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 19:35
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 124
51% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 364
42% 329 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3777) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2040 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.8% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 65.2
55% 67.8 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 69
Splatting 64.7
54% 65.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 144 78 120 58 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 293
Write 230
Mixed 236
SusWrite 99.6
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 18
68% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 204
175% 256 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51%
Great: 91%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
126GB free
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 158 116 104 101 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 320
Write 295
Mixed 156
SusWrite 138
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 12
59% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 159
141% 215 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
149GB free
Firmware: FBEOC40J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 58.9
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 50
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 36%
WD Elements 1TB
192GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 98 99 104 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 51.8
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 101
85% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FD BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 5.6
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback