Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 14:13
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 848
82% 674 Pts
64-Core 1088
67% 1088 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 88.3
55% 76.2 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 45.7
45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3128GNTD 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 115 99 56 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 962
Write 127
Mixed 191
SusWrite 91.4
74% 343 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 34.6
167% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 163
128% 181 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 184%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
145GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 466 421 288 288 289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 488
Mixed 464
SusWrite 358
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 63.9
216% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
602GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 65.5
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 103
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 139 135 134 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 134
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.9
238% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 75%
Mass Storage Device 268GB
250GB free, PID 121f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.9 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.36% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 1.6
6% 6.47 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 37.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback