Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 939
90% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,462
90% 1,462 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 188
Parallax 181
167% 191 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 146
Splatting 131
122% 153 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 141%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AS Velocity G4 1TB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM52.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 160 148 229 167 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 148
Write 1,773
Mixed 201
SusWrite 242
136% 591 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 5.8
81% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 980
518% 455 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 322%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 216 218 218 217 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AR36C18S8K2HU416R 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 35.1
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 38.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback