Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 01:23
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 1,015
91% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,435
89% 1,435 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 92
56% 74.8 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 47.5
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2252 2199 1168 1172 1189 1185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,485
Write 2,351
Mixed 1,667
SusWrite 1,527
450% 2,008 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 83.3
278% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 985
DQ Mixed 1,026
773% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 325%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
247GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 384 85 75 66 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 441
Mixed 379
SusWrite 188
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 52.3
177% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
517GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 87 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 77.1
Write 70.3
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 86
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 57%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
466GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 89 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 95.7
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 88.1
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 69%
FANTOM WD10EACS-14ZJB0 1TB
854GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 40 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.8
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 38.9
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4W.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 29.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 28.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback