Acer Aspire TC-280

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-280  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-280
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 11:37
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 46
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 122
43% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 190
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 38.5
22% 30.8 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 25.5
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 426 364 388 425 329 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 414
Mixed 216
SusWrite 378
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 41.4
139% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 243
183% 244 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 128%
SONY WALKMAN 4GB
3GB free, PID 09cb
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Read 6
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 6.3
8% 5.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
64% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBGR/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 14.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-280 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback