Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 25 '15 at 03:00
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 143
49% 108 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 507
48% 396 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8400) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3182
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.03
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 4
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 3.96
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 68.3
Mixed 44.2
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.25
74% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
25GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 96.2
Mixed 90.4
71% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.33
80% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 65%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
374GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.3% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 31
Mixed 14.1
31% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.23
64% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 17%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
84GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 30.7
Mixed 29.9
39% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.27
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 20%
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback