Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '21 at 05:44
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 188 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 526 53% 433 Pts	64-Core 531 33% 531 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	9.26% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 62.6 Parallax 4 0% 22.3 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 52.2 Splatting 0.5 27% 37.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 9.26% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 597GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 83 90 49 84 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 146 Write 123 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 80.1 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 109%
Fujitsu MJA2320BH G2 320GB 1,111 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 298GB free Firmware: 00000018 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 76 75 76 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 77.5 Write 73.3 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 75.4 49% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 385GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 105 107 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 113 Write 119 Mixed 62 SusWrite 107 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 300GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 35 Write 27.7 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 5.6 17% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 95%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 300GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.6 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 24.7 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 5.6 15% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 95%
USB Flash Memory 8GB 2,269 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.9 3.6 4.2 3.6 4.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 7.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.9 9% 7.72 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 7%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 542 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 2GB free, PID 800e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 1.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 2.7 6% 5.45 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 6%
TOSHIBA MK3263GSX 320GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 156GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 36.1 Write 35.8 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 11.8 36% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 17%
SMI USB DISK 4GB 2,026 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.3 5.3 5 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	3.94% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 3 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 5.2 7% 6.15 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.94% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,470x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,009x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	955x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	738x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	658x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	718x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	341x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	294x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16