Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Clevocenter W35xSS_370SS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemClevocenter W35xSS_370SS  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVOCENTER W35xSS_370SS
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 02:22
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 491
54% 424 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 74.9%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 3501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.2
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.17%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 120GB-$91
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT43B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 108 99 93 91 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 426
Mixed 315
SusWrite 121
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 46.3
161% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 180
184% 300 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 92.2%
 Great: 104%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
206GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 120 124 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66% Good
Read 106
Write 99.1
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 124
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 66%
 Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
190GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 73.4
Write 77.3
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 88.3
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 46.5%
 Great: 61%
Iomega E xternal HD 2TB
135GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 16.7
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 23.7
27% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 10.7%
 Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 60.3%
 Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback