Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory10.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1189 x 743 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime44.3 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 00:43
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 139
54% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 273
33% 256 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 537GB
102GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 0.8 4.6 6 5.5 9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.97% Terrible
Read 73.9
Write 33.1
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 6.5
8% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
2% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 65%
Vmware Virtual disk 123GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 1.1 6.6 9.5 8.3 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 48
Write 42.3
Mixed 101
SusWrite 10.3
39% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.8
525% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 73%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 81GB
44GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 1 0.5 0.9 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.52% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 19.5
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 1.3
11% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 54GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 2 3.4 6.1 5.5 9.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.2% Poor
Read 88.1
Write 43.1
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 6.4
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
73% 0.57 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 54GB
46GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 0.6 3 2.5 2.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.22% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 10
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 2.6
6% 8.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 54GB
49GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.69% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 19
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 0.4
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.1 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 34GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 0.4 1.6 0.2 2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8
Write 7.8
SusWrite 1.8
4% 5.87 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 64 slots used
64GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 37.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback