MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 10:59
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 872
89% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 1112 1117 1116 723 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,684
Write 1,116
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 872
262% 1,174 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 87.7
312% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 263
354% 627 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 253%
Great: 242%
HEMA_32G HEMA_32GB 32GB
24GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 173
Write 34.1
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 26.3
65% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
57% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback