Today's hottest deals

Huanan Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 18:34
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 73
2-Core 188
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 758
64% 554 Pts
64-Core 1,537
95% 1,537 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 85.6
Reflection 113
Parallax 70.8
70% 89.9 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 67.4
67% 84.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 57 55 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 456
Write 406
Mixed 376
SusWrite 90.7
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 26.6
86% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 237
196% 280 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 91%
NE-256 256GB
11GB free
Firmware: S0620A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,203
Write 203
Mixed 29
101% 478 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 2.1
62% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 234%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
67GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 74 73 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 78.1
Write 79
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 73
47% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
902GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 89.2
Write 93.4
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 80.3
98% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 44%
ASMT 2115 1TB
515GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 84 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 97.5
Write 68
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 82.9
97% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 167%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
326GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 73.8
104% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 44%
ASMT 2115 1TB
118GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 84 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 77.8
Write 78.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 84.7
96% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36%
Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
707GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 99.3
Write 97.9
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 106
113% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HNMI8GD4240D0 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.4% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback