Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 157 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 375 42% 329 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M 6,267 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 204A) 3GB CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.57 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	7.5% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 12 Parallax 7.8 7% 9.5 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 9.9 Splatting 9.3 8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.5% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3501103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 42 46 46 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 321 Write 291 Mixed 265 SusWrite 45.1 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 16.8 79% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 89.5 DQ Mixed 23.4 28% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 102%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87 21,339 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 612GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 45 47 46 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 96.9 Write 48.6 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 46.5 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SSA302G08-GDJEC 06C1 SSA302G08-GDJEC 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GTX 560MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,267 samples	481x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	10x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	9x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	61x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	44x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 447 samples	37x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $300