Today's hottest deals

HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z200 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory8.4 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 104
45% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 126
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 71.7
4% 71.7 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 170B) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 35 22 28 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 54
Write 52.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 30.7
30% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 47%
Seagate ST5000DM003-2FH18L 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 56 66 54 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 144
Write 93.6
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 59.2
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
299% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 88%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
462GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 77 70 43 64 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 96.1
Write 88.9
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 66.7
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 52%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 02.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 77 76 74 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 78.6
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback