PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100709 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 14 '21 at 18:12 |
Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 72% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 170B) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
|
0.76%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 35 22 28 16 MB/s
|
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST5000DM003-2FH18L 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 56 66 54 66 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
462GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 77 70 43 64 78 MB/s
|
46.7%
Average
|
|||
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 02.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 77 76 74 83 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 59x |
Core i5 650Intel $40Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 18x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 12x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 11x |
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |