Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 5  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 257
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 665
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gainward(10B0 104A) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 108 106 90 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 462
Write 127
Mixed 154
SusWrite 104
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 25.7
139% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 122
118% 193 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 71%
WD WD3000BLFS-08YBU0 300GB
273GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 119
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 9905403-153.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper 5 Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 5 - $391

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback