Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 20:08
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 199
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 385
52% 388 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 76.1
Parallax 70
60% 73.4 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 74
Splatting 69.3
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O123
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 330
Mixed 380
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 35.5
114% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 241
198% 280 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 91%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
82GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 361 371 366 363 372 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 378
Write 381
Mixed 276
SusWrite 350
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 34.1
122% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 320
245% 331 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 104%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
34GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 37
Write 30.8
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 6.3
33% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
26GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.1 6 6 6.1 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Read 26.8
Write 27.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 6
28% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 54%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.1 6 6 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 22.3
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 6
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 6 6 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 26.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 6
28% 21 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 74%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 6.1 6 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 22
Write 23
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 6
25% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 75%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 113 117 114 115 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 121
Write 100
Mixed 52
SusWrite 112
126% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
446GB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 6 6 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 6
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 72%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
3.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 6.1 6 6 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 26
Write 21.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 6
25% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 72%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
2TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 97 98 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 91.3
Write 95.2
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 96.7
121% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
244GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 65 66 66 65 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 111
Write 91.5
Mixed 85
SusWrite 64.4
115% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77-D3H Builds (Compare 1,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $332
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback