HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80C2
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 18:09
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 165
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 225
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 80C2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 7.1
4% 6.17 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8.3
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 285 302 302 296 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 426
Write 302
Mixed 267
SusWrite 298
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 22.8
89% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 249
210% 307 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 129%
Samsung SSD 860 1TB
297GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 37.6
Write 37.8
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 40.2
53% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 14.7
1,041% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.5
DQ Write 22.5
DQ Mixed 15.3
1,332% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 11.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback