HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory5.8 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 11:53
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 417
44% 354 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 41.1
37% 42.9 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 28.6
29% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 168 169 171 162 172 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 194
Write 196
Mixed 183
SusWrite 163
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 24.1
77% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 128
111% 164 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
16GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 76.6
Write 86.9
Mixed 57
SusWrite 72.4
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 70%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 1172
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.8 3.2 2.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Read 16.1
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.7
8% 7.38 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
24GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 11 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 99.6
Write 28.3
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 13.2
50% 46 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
101% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 42GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback