Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 158 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 404 43% 343 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M 2,951 User benchmarks, average bench 10% MSI(1462 10CB) 1.5GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 11.4 10% 13.2 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 12.9 Splatting 11.2 11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 171 108 118 107 128 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 410 Write 320 Mixed 316 SusWrite 146 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 13.6 49% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 44.7 49% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 56%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB 8,025 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 203GB free Firmware: 0001SDC1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 79 81 81 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 80 Write 78.9 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 78.7 52% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 63%
Intenso Rainbow Line 4GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 20 21 21 20 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	9.04% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 19.1 Mixed 11.1 SusWrite 19.8 25% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 9.04% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 4x4GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM