Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	100GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 100GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Xen HVM domU (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	29.4 GB free of 99.9922 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20201112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration	331 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 4 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.8% Above average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 50.3 2-Core 137 47% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 532 49% 412 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 268GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 250GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 152 141 140 123 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 420 Write 330 Mixed 374 SusWrite 140 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 24.4 83% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 142 103% 134 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 69%
Xensrc PVDISK 268GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 250GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 139 142 125 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 445 Write 347 Mixed 386 SusWrite 135 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 21.2 78% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 131 98% 132 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 69%
Xensrc PVDISK 107GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 154 141 138 129 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 109%
Xensrc PVDISK 537GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 500GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 138 141 124 139 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 101%
Xensrc PVDISK 537GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 500GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 138 142 129 125 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 101%
Xensrc PVDISK 537GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 500GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 151 153 143 136 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 101%
Xensrc PVDISK 537GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 500GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 143 139 127 127 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 101%
Xensrc PVDISK 537GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 500GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 282 290 287 152 144 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 74% null MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4088 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 16.3 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 5.9 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	54x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

RAM
29GBUnknownBench 65%, 119 samples	26x
1x15GBUnknownBench 59%, 628 samples	14x
44GBUnknownBench 23%, 6,316 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350