Ergodevices 7500-0009A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemErgodevices 7500-0009A  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-DS2V
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '21 at 13:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 183
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 386
52% 388 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0825) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 0.6
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS120G2G0A-00JH30 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8381c75
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 373 227 109 157 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 480
Write 368
Mixed 343
SusWrite 228
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 36
136% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 180
136% 178 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 81%
Generic S100 Hard drive 1TB
766GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 189 188 188 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 150
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 188
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7500-0009A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Ergodevices 7500-0009A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback