Asus H97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 582
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 21.5
18% 20.6 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.2
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$72
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 509
Write 467
Mixed 416
103% 464 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 44.9
156% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 242
197% 276 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 118%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
278GB free
Firmware: SS0328D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 699
Write 639
Mixed 119
107% 486 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 75.8
253% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 443
388% 583 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 193
Write 153
Mixed 98.1
110% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.8
330% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 1.2
25% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 52%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 181
Write 140
Mixed 99.4
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.8
383% 4.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1
24% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 52%
Adata HM900 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 113
Mixed 87.8
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
342% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 100%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 203
Write 159
Mixed 84
175% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 76%
ADATA HD710 1TB
609GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.2
Write 64.1
Mixed 52.4
82% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 0420 0423 Team-Elite-1600 0420 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO GAMER - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback