Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '21 at 03:25
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 158
2-Core 317
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 900
95% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
610GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1553 1049 1051 1053 1049 1052 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,700
SusWrite 1,134
376% 1,662 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 64.2
226% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,520
DQ Write 1,343
DQ Mixed 1,422
1,069% 1,428 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 261%
Great: 298%
Adata SU 800NS38 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: R042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 464 464 466 466 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 461
Mixed 463
SusWrite 466
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 59.4
196% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 248
194% 268 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
437GB free
Firmware: 2BA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 88.1
Write 64.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 87.8
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 35.3
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 36.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $617
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback