Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RF510/RF410/RF710
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110303
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '21 at 16:26
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 92.5 56% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 222 26% 201 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C08E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.68% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 8.3 Parallax 1.5 2% 4.27 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 3.4 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.68% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 122 117 122 121 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 229 Write 194 Mixed 194 SusWrite 122 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 13.5 45% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 156 120% 163 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 217GB free Firmware: GG2OA7J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 75 91 94 94 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 89.8 Write 88.6 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 90.2 55% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 58%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50 12,013 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 234GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 109 108 109 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 126 Write 124 Mixed 74.4 SusWrite 108 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.7% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 11.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RF510/RF410/RF710 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	30x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	26x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	55x
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	2x
Extreme 240GBSanDisk $200Bench 76%, 7,034 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	15x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 80CE M471B5273CH0-CF8 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 29 samples	3x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16