Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 83.9 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 105 54% 83.2 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 155 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610M 314 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0507) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 0.6 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
VR-128GB 120GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0722A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 330 367 369 369 367 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 446 Write 350 Mixed 313 SusWrite 359 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 14.5 78% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 77.2 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 24.5 71% 145 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47.2% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 13.1 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	131x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	49x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	15x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 2x2GBKingstonBench 38%, 1,037 samples	10x
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 1x2GBKingstonBench 21%, 403 samples	8x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 1,624 samples	7x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16